- 1 Short Disclaimer
- 2 The People’s Wellbeing is Better Served without the Pharmakei-driven Government’s Monopoly over Medicine
- 3 We Can all Participate in Freeing Medicine from the Government’s Pharmaceutical Claws
- 4 The FDA requires Strict Adherence to its Monopoly over Medicine
- 5 The Law provides that the Government’s Official Cancer Standards are the only acceptable ones. But is this Legal ?
- 6 Is the FDA constitutional ?
- 7 Heresy Bends over Backwards
- 8 General Legal Disclaimer
- 9 References
“It often happens that the universal belief of one age of mankind – a belief from which no one was, nor without an extraordinary effort of genius and courage, could at that time be free – becomes to a subsequent age so palpable an absurdity, that the only difficulty then is to imagine how such a thing can ever have appeared credible.” J.S. Mill, The Principles of Political Economy (1848)
The People’s Wellbeing is Better Served without the Pharmakei-driven Government’s Monopoly over Medicine
Pr Joubert is not a licensed conventional allopathic medical doctor nor a licensed conventional allopathic oncologist. He does not use, nor recommends these two medical systems, conventional allopathic medicine nor conventional oncology. He considers these medical systems to be outdated, flawed, unethical and way too dangerous, especially for those who are excluded from clinical trials, the elderly, children, pregnant women, the stressed out, people who suffer from other serious health conditions than cancer and all of the other more vulnerable people who can easily die from conventional oncology.
Joubert believes that these medical systems should be banned as soon as possible, peacefully, via the Courts and the Legislature. The evidence irrefutably confirms that these medical systems are based less on good Science, Ethics and the People’s welfare (protected by the Preamble of the US Constitution) than on an elaborate way to rip off financially the People and keep them controlled by perpetuating sickness as the norm. One of hundreds of proofs is that the Government appropriates less then 5 percent of its health funds on Prevention. And most (not all, just most) of what the Government does in terms of Public health and Prevention is an organized and purported sham, (to remain polite). Preventing chronic diseases would deprive the pharmaceutical, medical and polluting industries from cash-flow. Depriving these corporate giants from cash would threaten the election and re-election campaigns of most law-makers. So once in a position to enact statutes, most (not all, just most) of these power-hungry unethical individuals make laws that favor the People’s oppression, including, but not limited in the health field.
Having closely examined the totality of the evidence, I can write without hesitation that save a few elements in emergency and other forms of Medicine, most (not all, just most) of conventional allopathic standards of care that are enforced are worse than if the patient did nothing. And all the more so if the patients were educated to eat healthy organic Mediterranean, plant-strong and fiber-rich food, (which boosts the feel-good neuropeptides) to fast on occasion, (which boosts autophagy) to exercise out in the Sun where the Air is not toxic (which boosts regeneration and repair stem cells), to medidate (which boosts the longevity telomerase) to sleeping well (which boost human growth hormone) and, among dozens of other holistic techniques, to nurture a relaxed Joie-de-Vivre promoting of Lifestyle.
Just this re-prioritization of the Government’s public policies would significantly reduce all chronic diseases, slow down accelerated aging and in the process redirect trillions of cash-flow dollars from the coffers of those who control, profit and abuse this malignant “System of Things”, to the People’s needs, thank to which huge taxes would no longer finance waste, corruption, chronic diseases epidemics and this sick-care system we have before our very eyes.
Bottom line: The hard evidence irrefutably shows that the conventional and allopathy-based oncology medical systems that are legally promoted by those who have usurped the political power structure of the Nation lead to hundreds of thousands of premature deaths of Americans each year, (1) all of whom have been un-necessarily sacrificed on the altar of ignorance, corruption and an abundance of arrogance. To these deaths must be added an avalanche of un-necessary suffering and oppression.
These statements are bold. But the facts are established with strong evidence, most of which are available upon request when the viewer becomes a client. If the complex chronic diseased people sincerely want to reverse their degenerative and debilitation conditions, they must first fully realize that the primary reason why they are sick is because they have voted for a degenerative, debilitating and malignant political system that is fueled by an inflammatory and metastatic sick-care system. (A few pieces of evidence that materially supports a limited number of these allegations can be read via mouse click here).
It would therefore be unethical to endanger patients’ lives by using most of the standards that these two medical systems have normalized via corruption, bribery, coercion and misrepresentation. So Joubert is not and never will be a licensed medical doctor or allopathic oncologist serving this “System of Things”.
The last thing Joubert desires is to sign a Pact with the Devil by having the Government-protected and “prestigious” Initial “MD” after his name. A Pact to harm with dubious and toxic substances in exchange of financial gain is not only dishonorable, it is violative of Hippocratic oath.
By writing this last paragraph, I am not implying that most MDs are bad people. It’s the medical “System of things” that im critical of. Many medical doctors have a genuine passion for healing. Those who do abide by Hippocrates’ Oath feel stuck, are stressed out and need to pay bills. Many of these medical doctors also take some of these dubious prescription drugs themselves, synthetic molecules the human Liver sees as poisons. Most of these medical doctors have no education of real (holistic) science-based Medicine, from nutrition, to fasting, thermal therapy, the microbiota, heliotherapy, herbology balneotherapy, aromatherapy and much more. So they perpetrate onto their patients what they were taught in conventional medical schools: that by definition, a disease’s symptomatology is mostly the result of the deficiency of a drug. This malpractice is called: “A Pill for each Ill” Policy. More and more MDs are leaving this profession. But not enough to make a significant difference. So the oppression (dysfunction to be polite) of this sick-care system continues. Because those (most not all) who draft and adopt the Laws that govern health and well-being have willingly conspired to legally protect themselves from all liabilities via “political immunity” statutes, to accept “bribery” cash from Pharmakei in order to be elected (Source) and to enforce via coercion the monopoly of the type of Medicine that will keep the People addicted to prescription synthetic, toxic and dubious drugs for Life. One of the most “status quo” threats for those who are elitist parasites to a greed-driven political system is to encourage healthy people with critical minds to think and strongly say “no” to corruption and inanity. The historic and political significance of all of these mass shooters (most of whom were on prescription drugs before their barbaric acts) is nothing less than the Human Soul regularly reminding us that something is wrong and toxic in Orthodoxy’s medicine and conventional politics.
We Can all Participate in Freeing Medicine from the Government’s Pharmaceutical Claws
Pr Joubert is a former public law and holistic medicine professor. For over 15 years he taught these subjects in multiple education centers, from accredited universities to clinics and centers. Joubert did attend a conventional medical school and has experience with hospitals and clinical work as a naturopath and acupuncturist. He was also a court expert in holistic medicine and holistic oncology. His severe judgement (heresy) on the Government’s orthodox “Big-Bad-Pharma-based” conventional medical system is thus grounded in empiricism and protected by the Second Amendment and customary law. (2)
By not being a licensed medical doctor nor a Government certified conventional oncologist, Pr. Joubert is thus free to not harm patients, he is not obliged to force upon weak and gullible patients synthetic and toxic drugs, the delivery of which Dr Ali, Chief Pathologist of Holy Name Hospital in New Jersey, characterizes as coercitive.
“Individuals with cancer suffer twice: first with fear and suffering caused by their disease and second from the ravages of a malignant system that forces toxic drugs of dubious value on frightened and gullible people“. (2006) Majid Ali, M.D., author of integrative oncology. Dr. Ali is a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England and was formerly the chief pathologist of Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ.)
Today, Pr. Joubert is a YRE, (young retired “elder”) coach with past work experience in holistic oncology, biogerontology, naturopathy, herbalism, aromatherapy, wine medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine, law and organic farming. He has developed expertise in all of these fields, thanks to which he is able to help clients meaningfully, to awaken the healer within by helping patients live in a holistic way and showing them innovative and holistic rejuvenation techniques that help to slow down aging while the body progressively resolves most chronic and degenerative diseases, including, but not limited to the clearing of senescent, cancer and ectopic endometrial cells as well as the Government’s allowed and promoted toxins like glyphosate, acrylamides, benzene, arsenic, mercury, endocrine disruptors and tens of thousands of other pollutants that are damaging to health and killing Life from all directions.
Joubert is also someone who teaches clients how to avoid the pitfalls of the conventional medical system as well as the flaws of alternative oncology and integrative medicine.
He also helps patients to secure informed consent with the best options for complex chronic diseases and accelerated aging. (3)
The FDA requires Strict Adherence to its Monopoly over Medicine
The FDA requires me to write that if the viewer has cancer, the cancer patient should be under the care of licensed government-approved MDs, in particular allopathic oncologists. So OK, im writing this, in order to be in conformity with the Law.
But in reality, i need to inform people (4) that what the FDA rule is really say is that the Government’s FDA experts expects me, “We the People” to push innocent cancer patients into a malignant system that more often than not will rob them of their resources, their enjoyment of life and their lives.
Although more conventional oncologists use integrative oncology as an adjunctive tool in order to mitigate some of the deleterious effects of their basic treatments, they all insist that the patient begins the “cut-burn -poison” process “right away”. The problem with this approach is that it scares the patient to tears and more often than not, it doesn’t work.
One of the problems with the FDA promoting conventional oncology business is not only that the FDA’s experts and conventional oncologists often (not always, just often) promote bogus clinical trials and are in bed with the pharmaceuticals who often finance their activities, but they are either ignorant of, or complacent to the harm and deaths that are imposed on the weaker elements of Society, which are the majority now.
These are the vulnerable segments of the population who often are maimed for life or die from conventional medical procedures, devices and drugs that are tested on the stronger elements of the population. So when weaker people, the majority of patients, use these clinically proven medical procedures and drugs, they often can’t resist their toxic effects and develop myriad more expensive complications and then early death.
Yet, credible, evidence-based and healthier alternatives exist. But for the government experts, alternative oncology is pseudo-science, a sham, quakery and a medical fraud all at once. Digging deep, we find that these public health authority individuals are subconsciously talking more about conventional oncology than medical alternatives they know very little about, for example, even detoxification is seen by the N.I.H as quakery ! It’s written in their official documents.
The sadness with these FDA rules is that just about all of the chronic conditions that people suffer from can be safely and efficiently treated with Holistic Medicine, in a way that is not only affordable, but also enjoyable.
While Senator Harkin’s group had the great idea to verify alternative cancer clinics to ascertain what is really was safe and efficient in alternative oncology, Congress denied funding this endeavor and just about everything else which is truly holistic and sustainable.
To get back to my brief analysis of the Government’s toxic medicine, there is no question, for at least the last 15 years, that the Government’s certified (licensed) oncologists know or should know that the evidence has been strongly established that most of chemotherapy (chemo-poisons) and scarring radiation blasts not only cause new cancers, but they also destroy what can heal (the immune system and microbiota) while making stronger cancer stem cells. (See Welcome message)
If the viewer reads the evidence in the “Welcome message” hyperlinked above, he or she will see the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence that conventional oncology spurs the growth of cancer stem cells, these very cells that are responsible for both treatment resistance and metastasis.
In the conventional medical world, little if anything is done to meaningfully revolve this problem.
Meanwhile, the conventional medical oncology system is making huge amounts of money from metastasis, treatment resistance, nosocomial infections, iatrogenic deaths and other complications that are called “unforeseen adverse events”.
The Law provides that the Government’s Official Cancer Standards are the only acceptable ones. But is this Legal ?
The Government also requires me to write that nothing expressed in this Website, in the ACR Institute’s books, blogs, posts, emails, telephone or skype consultation and coachings with Pr Joubert or anyone else from the ACR Institute is a substitute for the Government’s conventional cancer standards.
So in order to be in conformity with the FDA’s coercitive rules, I’m writing what they expect me to write.
But i must add an addentum.
If the 2nd Amendment is still availing, i must therefore add that the FDA or any Government agent has no legal basis requiring me to support or not to support anything about any medical system I deem safe and efficient or not.
The Government more often than not uses its FDA agency as the primary regulator of health-care and drug distribution in this country and allows its nominated Commissioner to decide almost anything in the public health arena, including the marketing of drugs like DES and Vioxx, the one that killed over 50,000 Americans.
Is the FDA constitutional ?
Yet, as a legal entity, the present status of the FDA is violative of the separation of the three branches of Government: the FDA has an Execution branch (ie, its military squads that storm doctors’ clinics if they sell apricot seeds, inter alia), a Court system (whose clerks will send holistic practitioners warning letters before condeming them to pay huge fines) and a Legislative system (they often make their own rules, with the help of the conventional and pharmaceutical industries).
With this unconstitutional structure, the FDA military and their equivalent in States will shut down and even jail non-MD health practitioners, including Zen healers and Cannabis juicers, who treat cancer patients holistically. In the name of the People, these government agents will often seek prosecution based on the crime of practicing illegally medicine, even if patients don’t not complain and heal.
Furthermore, with the FDA rules as they presently are interpreted, MDs who do not use the State regulated Standards (chemo, radiation, surgery and the like) deviate from the Orthodoxy. As a result, the FDA can shut down their Clinic and the State Board can remove their license, even if there’s no complaint and the patient is helped.
So the viewer should understand that under these draconian conditions, the ACR Institute, Joubert and anyone affiliated with ACR Institute do not diagnose or treat cancer and informs vis Disclaimer patients that we are not a substitute to the Government’s allopathic cancer medicine. How could we ? More often than not, this medicine oppresses, maims and kills. (See Evidence under the Chapter “Basics”).
Heresy Bends over Backwards
The viewers of this Site are encouraged to confirm the accuracy of the information conveyed in this Website with reliable sources. The viewers are encouraged to review any and all recommendations made by this Website or Pr. Joubert with the viewer’s medical doctor and oncologist.
If the patient’s oncologist shows good faith, is respectful and is open minded with regard to the best available innovative and holistic techniques to control and reverse cancer without toxic side effects and treatment resistance, Pr Joubert may be willing to have a discussion with the oncologist, but in the patient’s presence.
Lastly, for this short disclaimer, because there are many grieved and angry patients and their beneficiaries who are often led to believe (often by their conventional doctor) that they should file frivolous actions against Holistic Medicine advocates and practitioners who feel they must ethically recommend to deviate from deleterious conventional medical standards, it must be stated that neither Joubert nor his staff or colleagues will be scapegoats, no one affiliated with ACR Institute is liable for any indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising from the use of this Site, other writings or the Institute’s consultation service.
And any lawsuit against Pr. Joubert, this Website, ACR Institute’s agents or affiliates steming from the generous sharing of precious health promoting knowledge shall be covered with the Indemnification clause of Article 8 of the Site’s Terms. So this was the short to-the-point Disclaimer. Now for the longer more classical version.
General Legal Disclaimer
“All men make mistakes, but a good man yields when he knows his course is wrong, and repairs the evil. The only crime is pride.” Sophocles, Antigone
Furthermore, from the viewpoint of medical law, ACR Institute can’t make any warranties nor express or implied representations regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, comparative or controversial nature, or usefulness of any information contained or referenced herein (on this Web-site).
When Site authors write about controversial “toxicity” subjects like the antibiotics epidemic, vaccine abuse, radiation toxicity and cytotoxic chemo-fraud, these representations are made in light of the First Amendment and in hope that the “Public Debate” will better understand the deleterious nature of most of these medical modalities which are both outdated and damaging.
In this perspective, ACR Institute does not assume any risk whatsoever for the use, mis-use or abuse of the viewer with regard to the interpretation of the content contained herein.
Health-related information changes frequently and therefore information contained on this Site may be outdated, incomplete or incorrect. Statements made about products and medical procedures may have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration or other Government agency.
Use of this Web site does not create an expressed or implied physician-patient relationship.
Moreover, ACR Institute does not record specific website user information.
You are using this Site at your own risk and thus necessarily assume all risks, including, but not limimted to the risk of death.
By continuing delving into this Website however, the weight of the evidence and ACR Institute’s Mission may persuade you to reduce your risks associated with conventional cancer treatments and invasive diagnosis procedures, including but not limited to biopsies, surgeries, radiation, chemotherapy, target therapies, combinational therapies and immunotherapeutics.
Refusing many of these alleged damaging modalities may incur the risk of losing insurance coverage. Sometimes, some of these above-mentioned modalities can be indicated, especially if the cancer patient can’t get himself or herself to live in a holistic way.
Whatever the final decision, it should be debated upon with a cancer team that is as competent and diversified as possible. Your Life may be on the line.
A cancer patient should not be afraid to distance himself or herself from any and all dubious treatment proposals, whether it be conventional, integrative or alternative. The ACR Institute’s team strongly encourages the cancer patient to be diligent and request convincing proof for whatever is offered.
In this perspective, the ACR Institute team can help you to ask the right questions to your oncologist and primary care physician and all the more so that the ACR Institute director is a former Professor of law who has medical malpractice and products liability litigation experience.
If this is your intent, be ready to ask us relevant questions if you feel you need compelling evidence to secure informed consent with regard to your oncologist’s treatment plan.
Furthermore, the ACR Institute’s Team can not only guide you to the asking of the right and relevant questions to your oncologists and primary-care physician, its first consultancy or coaching session can give you the tools and the knowledge that will empower you to be immediately equipped with basic anti-cancer survival techniques that need no medical prescription, as they are holistic in nature.
It is our experience that most conventional oncology medical “options discussion” and, to a lesser degree, many “integrative oncology” “options discussions” are self-serving and misleading, in that they debunk alternative, naturopathic and holistic medicine without cause, let alone knowledge and offer you procedures that may not be the best personalized option for your health challenges.
In using this website you agree that neither ACR Institute nor any party connected to ACR Institute is or will be liable or otherwise responsible for any decision made or any action taken or any action not taken due to your use of any information that comes from this Website.
One of the preferred “causes of action” plaintiff tort attorneys use against holistic and alternative practitioners is based on the “loss of chance” argument, meaning that if a holistic health professional recommends high-dose Vitamin C in lieu of high-dose chemo for example, and if for some reason, including past conventional treatments and-or the cancer patient’s will do die, the high dose Vitamin C (or one of 300 other integrative and holistic oncology techniques) did not work for your case, then the holistic or integrative oncology professional could be liable under both State and Federal Law and in case of harm or death, a patient, or beneficiary could sue and all the more so that in the “grief process”, there is an “anger” phase that seeks scapegoats. In this perspective, alternative holistic health heretics are too often the perfect mainstream targets to institutionalized legal harassment and frivolous suits.
Thus, in order to minimize the risks of frivolous prosecution, we invoke Article 8 of the ACR Institute’s terms on the Indemnification clause, whereby you agree to defend, indemnify the SITE and its agents against any and all legal claims that you or your beneficiaries may decide to launch against the ACR Institute, its agents and integrity. (See terms)
To avoid any and all ambiguities to this above-mentioned effect, the ACR Institute will never recommend in any consultancy or coaching session any such “loss of chance” procedure, even if highly grounded in Science and praxis. The ACR Institute may inform you that this surviving cancer patient preferred this holistic option and was successful with it, it may tell you what the ACR institute prefers personally, if a Team member got a cancer diagnosis, what he or she would do, but the ACR Institute can not legally tell you what you should do or not do, we will only show you the compelling evidence of all of the different and relevant options we are aware of and that may be available to you. Thereafter, it will be up to the cancer patient to decide what to do and not do with his or her body and Life.
Pr. Joubert (Founder-Director of ACR Institute)
For the complete set of Legal Terms, click here
By clicking CONTINUE and by reading any and all of the Site’s files (posts, pages, widgets and whatnot), you unconditionally accept all of the terms above and you are fully informed of the “risks” that reading any portion of this SITE may alienate you from the pharmakie-fueled Government thereby causing some mental and emotional stress.
The CONTINUE click will bring you to the NEXT LEVEL of Holistic awareness
To read the ACR Institute’s Public Policy Mission, Click Here
This Website is still under construction
“… because all the nations were deceived by your pharmakei” (Revelation 18:23)
(1). A 2016 study that came out from Johns Hopkins University corroborated that every year more than 250,000 people in the United States are killed from medical errors. Other published sources show that the more exact number of killed patients from this conventional medical system of things is over 400,000. (Source) Other published studies show that iatrogenic and nosocomial deaths are closer to one million of avoidable American deaths per year. If we add this toll to the toll that kills Americans from the Government subsidized agri-business, the American Government promoted processed foods business, the American Government rules on environmental pollution and havoc, the crippled legal structure and other deeply flawed institutions, we can assert that out of the 2.8 millions Americans who die each year, most of these deaths are the result of the public policies that result from those (most, not all) who have stripped the People from their fundamental right to benefit from equal access to holistic wellbeing and a healthy cancer-free lifespan of over 100 years.
(2). One of hundreds, perhaps thousands other pieces of evidence of the conventional medical system’s…opiod epidemic.
(3). Medmal two forms negligence and viol info consent…Daily practice, the courts crippled…this too needs to be fixed if Great again. His first expertise is helping patients with cancer and also to significantly slow down accelerated aging so as to in good shape at least 110 years achieve 120 years and cancer. Both these health conditions are activated by similar pathways
4 Because i’ve sworn to the Hippocratic Oath and my job is to help people secure informed consent, i must inform unsuspecting patients of the dangers of the Government’s medicine. Not even naturopathic doctors can treat cancer patients. Most states and the Federal Government require specific cancer standards of care that only MD oncologists can provide. Like putting poisons in the veins of cancer patients or blasting them with burning radiation. Acupuncturists, naturopaths, homeopaths, NDs and other health professionals are not allowed to be oncologists to apply these conventional standards of care. And if they forgo the Five primary conventional oncological tools (chemo, radiation, surgery, targeted therapy, which includes hormonal therapy, and conventional immunotherapy, which includes gene engineering, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines), they can be sued under the “cause of action” called “loss of chance”, by having deviated from the official norms. Patients have a right to refuse any treatments and activate self-healing, including with the help of a coach. But health professionals don’t. Even a general practitioner needs to refer his cancer patient to oncologists
Not everything in the Public Sector is deleterious. At this juncture of human evolution, some Government is needed. A Government for the People and in favor of Life. With righteous government agents who are not afraid to say “no” to corruption and complacency.
if the 2nd Amendment is still is availing,
Disclaimer: Nothing in this education website should be construed as legal, medical or subversive advise. In consulting with H.M. Institute experts, there is no patient-doctor relationship. Advanced Cancer Research Institute consultation experts are consultants and coaches that share information to help reset a client’s health back to homeostasis and happiness mode without any diagnosis nor conventional drug prescription treatment plan. This web site is neither for third-party product advertising nor dispensing any form of conventional medicine. Clients who consult with ACR Institute experts receive information in an educational context in an effort to understand both the biological mechanisms underlying diseases and the conditions to optimize healthy lifespan and peak performance.
2019 (c) Advanced Cancer Research Institute and agents. All Rights Reserved