Cancer has many different types of causes, from triggers, to deeper causes connected to metabolic, immune, nervous and microbiome dysfunction.
For triggers we have carcinogens, like viruses, bacteria, mold, parasites, and any substance, in particular a chemical or radionuclide, (radiation) that promotes carcinogenesis, the formation of cancer. This may be due to the ability to damage the genome via mutation and alter cellular metabolic processes.
In this perspective, several radioactive substances are considered carcinogens, but their carcinogenic activity is attributed to the radiation, for example gamma rays and alpha particles, which they emit. Common examples of non-radioactive carcinogens are inhaled asbestos, certain dioxins, thousands of chemicals like glyphosate and tobacco smoke. Although the public generally associates carcinogenicity with synthetic chemicals, carcinogens can also be “natural” like mercury, lead, arsenic and radon.  Carcinogens are not necessarily immediately toxic; thus, their effect can be insidious.
Cancer is any disease in which normal cells are damaged and do not undergo programmed cell death as fast as they divide via mitosis. Carcinogens may increase the risk of cancer by altering cellular metabolism or damaging DNA directly in cells, which interferes with biological processes, and induces the uncontrolled, malignant division, ultimately leading to the formation of tumors. Usually, severe DNA damage leads to programmed cell death, but if the programmed cell death pathway is damaged, then the cell cannot prevent itself from becoming a cancer cell.
There are many natural carcinogens. Aflatoxin B1, which is produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus growing on stored grains, nuts and peanut butter, is an example of a potent, naturally occurring microbial carcinogen. Certain viruses such as hepatitis B and human papilloma virus have been found to cause cancer in humans. The first one shown to cause cancer in animals is Rous sarcoma virus, discovered in 1910 by Peyton Rous. Other infectious organisms which cause cancer in humans include some bacteria (e.g. Helicobacter pylori ) and helminths (e.g. Opisthorchis viverrini  and Clonorchis sinensis.
Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds, benzene, kepone, EDB, and asbestos have all been classified as carcinogenic. As far back as the 1930s, Industrial smoke and tobacco smoke were identified as sources of dozens of carcinogens, including benzo[a]pyrene, tobacco-specific nitrosamines such as nitrosonornicotine, and reactive aldehydes such as formaldehyde, which is also a hazard in embalming and making plastics. Vinyl chloride, from which PVC is manufactured, is a carcinogen and thus a hazard in PVC production.
Co-carcinogens are chemicals that do not necessarily cause cancer on their own, but promote the activity of other carcinogens in causing cancer.
After the carcinogen enters the body, the body makes an attempt to eliminate it through a process called biotransformation. The purpose of these reactions is to make the carcinogen more water-soluble so that it can be removed from the body. However, in some cases, these reactions can also convert a less toxic carcinogen into a more toxic carcinogen.
DNA is nucleophilic; therefore, soluble carbon electrophiles are carcinogenic, because DNA attacks them. For example, some alkenes are toxicated by human enzymes to produce an electrophilic epoxide. DNA attacks the epoxide, and is bound permanently to it. This is the mechanism behind the carcinogenicity of benzo[a]pyrene in tobacco smoke, other aromatics, aflatoxin and mustard gas. In general, polymers are not known as carcinogens or mutagens. However, residual monomers or additives can cause genetic muta tions.
CERCLA identifies all radionuclides, including those in mamograms, CT scans and radiotherapy, as carcinogens, although the nature of the emitted radiation (alpha, beta, gamma, or neutron and the radioactive strength), its consequent capacity to cause ionization in tissues, and the magnitude of radiation exposure, determine the potential hazard. Carcinogenicity of radiation depends on the type of radiation, type of exposure, and penetration. For example, alpha radiation has low penetration and is not a hazard outside the body, but emitters are carcinogenic when inhaled or ingested. For example, Thorotrast, a (incidentally radioactive) suspension previously used as a contrast medium in x-ray diagnostics, is a potent human carcinogen known because of its retention within various organs and persistent emission of alpha particles. Low-level ionizing radiation may induce irreparable DNA damage (leading to replicational and transcriptional errors needed for neoplasia or may trigger viral interactions) leading to pre-mature aging and cancer.
Not all types of electromagnetic radiation are carcinogenic. Low-energy waves on the electromagnetic spectrum including radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation and visible light are thought not to be, because they have insufficient energy to break chemical bonds. Evidence for carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing radiation is generally inconclusive, though there are some documented cases of radar technicians with prolonged high exposure experiencing significantly higher cancer incidence.
Higher-energy radiation, including ultraviolet radiation (present in sunlight), x-rays, and gamma radiation, generally is carcinogenic, if received in sufficient doses. For most people, ultraviolet radiations from sunlight is the most common cause of skin cancer. In Australia, where people with pale skin are often exposed to strong sunlight, melanoma is the most common cancer diagnosed in people aged 15–44 years.
Substances or foods irradiated with electrons or electromagnetic radiation (such as microwave, X-ray or gamma) are not carcinogenic. In contrast, non-electromagnetic neutron radiation produced inside nuclear reactors can produce secondary radiation through nuclear transmutation.
Cooking and Carcinogens
Chemicals used in processed and cured meat such as some brands of bacon, sausages and ham may or may not produce carcinogens. For example, nitrites used as food preservatives in cured meat such as bacon have also been noted as being carcinogenic with demographic links, but not causation, to colon cancer. Cooking food at high temperatures, for example grilling or barbecuing meats, can, or can not, also lead to the formation of minute quantities of many potent carcinogens that are comparable to those found in cigarette smoke (i.e., benzo[a]pyrene). Charring of food looks like coking and tobacco pyrolysis, and produces carcinogens. There are several carcinogenic pyrolysis products, such as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, which are converted by human enzymes into epoxides, which attach permanently to DNA. Pre-cooking meats in a microwave oven for 2–3 minutes before grilling shortens the time on the hot pan, and removes heterocyclic amine (HCA) precursors, which can help minimize the formation of these carcinogens.
Reports from the Food Standards Agency have found that the known animal carcinogen acrylamide is generated in fried or overheated carbohydrate foods (such as french fries and potato chips). Studies are underway at the FDA and European regulatory agencies to assess its potential risk to humans.
Tobacco and health
There is a strong association of smoking with lung cancer; the lifetime risk of developing lung cancer increases significantly in smokers. A large number of known carcinogens are found in cigarette smoke. Potent carcinogens found in cigarette smoke include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH, such as benzo[a]pyrene), Benzene, and Nitrosamine. The tar from cigarette smoke is similar to that of marijuana smoke and contains similar carcinogens.
Genotoxic or non Genotoxic
Carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. Genotoxins cause irreversible genetic damage or mutations by binding to DNA. Genotoxins include chemical agents like N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU) or non-chemical agents such as ultraviolet light and ionizing radiation. Certain viruses can also act as carcinogens by interacting with DNA. Nongenotoxins do not directly affect DNA but act in other ways to promote growth. These include hormones and some organic compounds.
|Group 1||Cat. 1A||Known||A1||Cat. 1|
|Group 2A||Cat. 1B||Reasonably
|Cat. 2||A3||Cat. 3|
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is an intergovernmental agency established in 1965, which forms part of the World Health Organization of the United Nations. It is based in Lyon, France. Since 1971 it has published a series of Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans that have been highly influential in the classification of possible carcinogens.
Group 1: the agent (mixture) is definitely carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are carcinogenic to humans.
Group 2A: the agent (mixture) is probably carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are probably carcinogenic to humans.
Group 2B: the agent (mixture) is possibly carcinogenic to humans. The exposure circumstance entails exposures that are possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Group 3: the agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.
Group 4: the agent (mixture) is probably not carcinogenic to humans.
The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) is a United Nations initiative to attempt to harmonize the different systems of assessing chemical risk which currently exist (as of March 2009) around the world. It classifies carcinogens into two categories, of which the first may be divided again into subcategories if so desired by the competent regulatory authority:
Category 1: known or presumed to have carcinogenic potential for humans
Category 1A: the assessment is based primarily on human evidence
Category 1B: the assessment is based primarily on animal evidence
Category 2: suspected human carcinogens
The National Toxicology Program of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is mandated to produce a biennial Report on Carcinogens. As of June 2011, the latest edition was the 12th report (2011). It classifies carcinogens into two groups: Known to be a human carcinogen Reasonably anticipated being a human carcinoge
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) is a private organization best known for its publication of threshold limit values (TLVs) for occupational exposure and monographs on workplace chemical hazards. It assesses carcinogenicity as part of a wider assessment of the occupational hazards of chemicals.
Group A1: Confirmed human carcinogen
Group A2: Suspected human carcinogen
Group A3: Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans
Group A4: Not classifiable as a human carcinogen
Group A5: Not suspected as a human carcinogen
The European Union classification of carcinogens is contained in the Dangerous Substances Directive and the Dangerous Preparations Directive. It consists of three categories:
Category 1: Substances known to be carcinogenic to humans.
Category 2: Substances which should be regarded as if they are carcinogenic to humans.
Category 3: Substances which cause concern for humans, owing to possible carcinogenic effects but in respect of which the available information is not adequate for making a satisfactory assessment.
This assessment scheme is being phased out in favor of the GHS scheme (see above), to which it is very close in category definitions.
Under a previous name, the NOHSC, in 1999 Safe Work Australia published the Approved Criteria for Classifying Hazardous Substances [NOHSC:1008(1999)].Section 4.76 of this document outlines the criteria for classifying carcinogens as approved by the Australian government. This classification consists of three categories:
Category 1: Substances known to be carcinogenic to humans.
Category 2: Substances that should be regarded as if they were carcinogenic to humans.
Category 3: Substances that have possible carcinogenic effects in humans but about which there is insufficient information to make an assessment.
A procarcinogen is a precursor to a carcinogen. One example is nitrites when taken in by the diet. They are not carcinogenic themselves, but turn into nitrosamines in the body, which can be carcinogenic.
Occupational carcinogens are agents that pose a risk of cancer in several specific work-locations:
|Carcinogen||Associated cancer sites or types||Occupational uses or sources|
|Arsenic and its compounds||
||Not in widespread use, but found in:
|Beryllium and its compounds||
|Cadmium and its compounds||
|Hexavalent chromium(VI) compounds||
|IC engine exhaust gas||
|Radon and its decay products||
|Shift work that involvescircadian disruption||
|Involuntary smoking (Passive smoking)||
and other alpha particle
emitters with high atomic weight
Unless otherwise specified, ref is:
Gasoline (contains aromatics)
Lead and its compounds
Alkylating antineoplastic agents (e.g. mechlorethamine)
Other alkylating agents (e.g. dimethyl sulfate)
Ultraviolet radiation from the sun and UV lamps
Excessive Alcohol (causing head and neck cancers) Alcohol mixed with good quality grape juice(wine) in moderation has the opposite effect. See the ACR Institute’s book on this subject.
Other ionizing radiation (X-rays, gamma rays, etc.
In this section, the carcinogens implicated as the main causative agents of the four most common cancers worldwide are briefly described. These four cancers are lung, breast, colon, and stomach cancers. Together they account for about 41% of worldwide cancer incidence and 42% of cancer deaths (for more detailed information on the carcinogens implicated in these and other cancers, see references).
Lung cancer (pulmonary carcinoma) is the most common cancer in the world, both in terms of cases (1.6 million cases; 12.7% of total cancer cases) and deaths (1.4 million deaths; 18.2% of total cancer deaths). Lung cancer is largely caused by tobacco smoke. Risk estimates for lung cancer in the United States indicate that tobacco smoke is responsible for 90% of lung cancers. Other factors are implicated in lung cancer, and these factors can interact synergistically with smoking so that total attributable risk adds up to more than 100%. These factors include occupational exposure to carcinogens (about 9-15%), radon (10%) and outdoor air pollution (1-2%).Tobacco smoke is a complex mixture of more than 5,300 identified chemicals. The most important carcinogens in tobacco smoke have been determined by a “Margin of Exposure” approach. Using this approach, the most important tumorigenic compounds in tobacco smoke were, in order of importance, acrolein, formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, 1,3-butadiene, cadmium, acetaldehyde, ethylene oxide, and isoprene. Most of these compounds cause DNA damage by forming DNA adducts or by inducing other alterations in DNA. DNA damages are subject to error-prone DNA repair or can cause replication errors. Such errors in repair or replication can result in mutations in tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes leading to cancer
Breast cancer is the second most common cancer [(1.4 million cases, 10.9%), but ranks 5th as cause of death (458,000, 6.1%)]. Increased risk of breast cancer is associated with persistently elevated blood levels of estrogen. Estrogen appears to contribute to breast carcinogenesis by three processes; (1) the metabolism of estrogen to genotoxic, mutagenic carcinogens, (2) the stimulation of tissue growth, and (3) the repression of phase II detoxification enzymes that metabolize ROS leading to increased oxidative DNA damage. The major estrogen in humans, estradiol, can be metabolized to quinone derivatives that form adducts with DNA. These derivatives can cause dupurination, the removal of bases from the phosphodiester backbone of DNA, followed by inaccurate repair or replication of the apurinic site leading to mutation and eventually cancer. This genotoxic mechanism may interact in synergy with estrogen receptor-mediated, persistent cell proliferation to ultimately cause breast cancer. Genetic background, dietary practices and environmental factors also likely contribute to the incidence of DNA damage and breast cancer risk
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer [1.2 million cases (9.4%), 608,000 deaths (8.0%)]. Tobacco smoke may be responsible for up to 20% of colorectal cancers in the United States. In addition, substantial evidence implicates bile acids as an important factor in colon cancer. Twelve studies (summarized in Bernstein et al.) indicate that the bile acids deoxycholic acid (DCA) and/or lithocholic acid (LCA) induce production of DNA-damaging reactive oxygen species and/or reactive nitrogen species in human or animal colon cells. Furthermore, 14 studies showed that DCA and LCA induce DNA damage in colon cells. Also 27 studies reported that bile acids cause programmed cell death (apoptosis). Increased apoptosis can result in selective survival of cells that are resistant to induction of apoptosis. Colon cells with reduced ability to undergo apoptosis in response to DNA damage would tend to accumulate mutations, and such cells may give rise to colon cancer. Epidemiologic studies have found that fecal bile acid concentrations are increased in populations with a high incidence of colon cancer. Dietary increases in total fat or saturated fat result in elevated DCA and LCA in feces and elevated exposure of the colon epithelium to these bile acids. When the bile acid DCA was added to the standard diet of wild-type mice invasive colon cancer was induced in 56% of the mice after 8 to 10 months. Overall, the available evidence indicates that DCA and LCA are centrally important DNA-damaging carcinogens in colon cancer
Stomach cancer is the fourth most common cancer [990,000 cases (7.8%), 738,000 deaths (9.7%)]. Helicobacter pylori infection is the main causative factor in stomach cancer. Chronic gastritis (inflammation) caused by H. pylori is often long-standing if not treated. Infection of gastric epithelial cells with H. pylori results in increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS cause oxidative DNA damage including the major base alteration 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). 8-OHdG resulting from ROS is increased in chronic gastritis. The altered DNA base can cause errors during DNA replication that have mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. Thus H. pylori-induced ROS appear to be the major carcinogens in stomach cancer because they cause oxidative DNA damage leading to carcinogenic mutations. Diet is thought to be a contributing factor in stomach cancer – in Japan where very salty pickled foods are popular, the incidence of stomach cancer is high. Preserved meat such as bacon, sausages, and ham increases the risk while a diet high in fresh fruit and vegetables may reduce the risk. The risk also increases with age.
More later, Text under construction
- Ames, Bruce N; Gold, Lois Swirsky (2000). “Paracelsus to parascience: The environmental cancer distraction”. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 447: 3–13. doi:10.1016/S0027-5107(99)00194-3.
- Hatakeyama M, Higashi H (December 2005). “Helicobacter pylori CagA: a new paradigm for bacterial carcinogenesis”. Cancer Science. 96 (12): 835–43. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00130.x. 16367902.
- González CA, Sala N, Rokkas T (September 2013). “Gastric cancer: epidemiologic aspects”. Helicobacter. 18 (Supplement 1): 34–8. doi:10.1111/hel.12082. 24011243.
- Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P, Mairiang E, Laha T, Smout M, Pairojkul C, Bhudhisawasdi V, Tesana S, Thinkamrop B, Bethony JM, Loukas A, Brindley PJ (July 2007). “Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma”. PLoS Medicine. 4 (7): 1148–1155. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040201. 1913093. 17622191.
- Rustagi T, Dasanu CA (June 2012). “Risk factors for gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma: similarities, differences and updates”. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 43 (2): 137–47. doi:10.1007/s12029-011-9284-y. 21597894.
- Report on Carcinogens, Eleventh Edition Archived April 20, 2009, at the Wayback Machine; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program (2011).
- Vert, Michel; Doi, Yoshiharu; Hellwich, Karl-Heinz; Hess, Michael; Hodge, Philip; Kubisa, Przemyslaw; Rinaudo, Marguerite; Schué, François (2012). “Terminology for biorelated polymers and applications (IUPAC Recommendations 2012)”(PDF). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 84 (2): 377–410. doi:10.1351/PAC-REC-10-12-04.
- Acharya, PVN; The Effect of Ionizing Radiation on the Formation of Age-Correlated Oligo Deoxyribo Nucleo Phosphoryl Peptides in Mammalian Cells; 10th International Congress of Gerontology, Jerusalem. Abstract No. 1; January 1975. Work was done while employed by Dept. of Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
- Acharya, PVN; Implications of The Action of Low-Level Ionizing Radiation on the Inducement of Irreparable DNA Damage Leading to Mammalian Aging and Chemical Carcinogenesis.; 10th International Congress of Biochemistry, Hamburg, Germany. Abstract No. 01-1-079; July 1976. Work was done while employed by Dept. of Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
- Acharya, PV Narasimh; Irreparable DNA-Damage by Industrial Pollutants in Pre-mature Aging, Chemical Carcinogenesis, and Cardiac Hypertrophy: Experiments and Theory; 1st International Meeting of Heads of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel. April 1977. Work conducted at Industrial Safety Institute and Behavioral Cybernetics Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
- Richter E, Berman T, Ben-Michael E, Laster R, Westin JB (2000). “Cancer in radar technicians exposed to radiofrequency/microwave radiation: sentinel episodes”. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 6 (3): 187–93. doi:10.1179/oeh.2000.6.3.187. 10926722.
- “Skin Cancer Facts and Figures”. Retrieved 2010-07-02.
- Skin-tone gene could predict cancer risk
- “Processed meats do cause cancer – WHO”. BBC. 26 October 2015.
- Scanlan RA (May 1983). “Formation and occurrence of nitrosamines in food”. Cancer Research. 43 (5 Suppl): 2435s–2440s. 6831466.
- Wei Zheng, Deborah R Gustafson, Rashmi Sinha, James R Cerhan, et al. “Well-done meat intake and the risk of breast cancer.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford: Nov 18, 1998.Vol. 90, Iss. 22; pg. 1724, 6 pgs.
- “National Cancer Institute, 2004 analysis and recommendations”. Cancer.gov. 2004-09-15. Retrieved 2010-09-22.
- “Acrylamide”. (Source)
- Villeneuve PJ, Mao Y (1994). “Lifetime probability of developing lung cancer, by smoking status, Canada”. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 85 (6): 385–8. 7895211.
- “Harms of Cigarette Smoking and Health Benefits of Quitting”. National Cancer Institute. 2017-12-21.
- Tomar, Rajpal C.; Beaumont and Hsieh (August 2009). “Evidence on the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke” (PDF). Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Branch Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 23 June 2012.
- “The Gale Encyclopedia of Cancer: A guide to Cancer and its Treatments, Second Edition. Page no. 137″.
- “IARC Monographs”. Monographs.iarc.fr. Retrieved 2010-09-22.
- Section 301(b)(4) of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by Section 262, Pub. L. 95–622.
- Safe Work Australia Archived 2010-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, NOHSC. (1999). Approved criteria for classifying hazardous substances [NOHSC:1008(1999)] § 4.76. Accessed 21/05/2011
- “Web definitions for Procarcinogen”. Lactospore.com. Archived from the original on 2010-09-27. Retrieved 2010-09-22.
- Hartwig, Andrea (2013). “Chapter 15. Cadmium and cancer”. In Astrid Sigel, Helmut Sigel and Roland K. O. Sigel. Cadmium: From Toxicology to Essentiality. Metal Ions in Life Sciences. 11. Springer. pp. 491–507. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5179-8_15. ISBN 978-94-007-5178-1. 23430782.
- “IARC: DIESEL ENGINE EXHAUST CARCINOGENIC” (PDF). International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Archived from the original (Press release) on September 13, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2012.
June 12, 2012 ‐‐ After a week-long meeting of international experts, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), today classified diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer
- “IARC Monographs Programme finds cancer hazards associated with shiftwork, painting and firefighting, International Agency for Research on Cancer”. Retrieved 2011-07-01
- Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking Archived 2015-03-15 at the Wayback Machine, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 83 (2004).
- Survival, causes of death, and estimated tissue doses in a group of human beings injected with plutonium, 751053, R. E. Rowland and Patricia W. Durbin, 1975.
- Table 6-2 in: Mitchell, Richard Sheppard; Kumar, Vinay; Abbas, Abul K.; Fausto, Nelson (2007). Robbins Basic Pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders. ISBN 978-1-4160-2973-1. 8th edition.
- Bernstein H, Payne CM, Bernstein C, Garewal H, Dvorak K (2008). Cancer and aging as consequences of un-repaired DNA damage. In: New Research on DNA Damages (Editors: Honoka Kimura and Aoi Suzuki) Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, Chapter 1, pp. 1-47. open access, but read only https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=43247Archived 2014-10-25 at the Wayback Machine ISBN 978-1604565812
- Bernstein C, Prasad AR, Nfonsam V, Bernstein H. (2013). DNA Damage, DNA Repair and Cancer, New Research Directions in DNA Repair, Prof. Clark Chen (Ed.), ISBN 978-953-51-1114-6, InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-research-directions-in-dna-repair/dna-damage-dna-repair-and-cancer
- Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (December 2010). “Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008″. International Journal of Cancer. 127 (12): 2893–917. doi:10.1002/ijc.25516. 21351269.
- Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM (September 2007). “Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)”. Chest. 132 (3 Suppl): 29S–55S. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1347. 17873159.
- Cunningham FH, Fiebelkorn S, Johnson M, Meredith C (November 2011). “A novel application of the Margin of Exposure approach: segregation of tobacco smoke toxicants”. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 49 (11): 2921–33. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.019. 21802474.
- Yager JD, Davidson NE (January 2006). “Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 354 (3): 270–82. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050776. 16421368.
- Ansell PJ, Espinosa-Nicholas C, Curran EM, Judy BM, Philips BJ, Hannink M, Lubahn DB (January 2004). “In vitro and in vivo regulation of antioxidant response element-dependent gene expression by estrogens”. Endocrinology. 145 (1): 311–7. doi:10.1210/en.2003-0817. 14551226.
- Belous AR, Hachey DL, Dawling S, Roodi N, Parl FF (January 2007). “Cytochrome P450 1B1-mediated estrogen metabolism results in estrogen-deoxyribonucleoside adduct formation”. Cancer Research. 67 (2): 812–7. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2133. 17234793.
- Bolton JL, Thatcher GR (January 2008). “Potential mechanisms of estrogen quinone carcinogenesis”. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 21 (1): 93–101. doi:10.1021/tx700191p. 2556295. 18052105.
- Yue W, Santen RJ, Wang JP, Li Y, Verderame MF, Bocchinfuso WP, Korach KS, Devanesan P, Todorovic R, Rogan EG, Cavalieri EL (September 2003). “Genotoxic metabolites of estradiol in breast: potential mechanism of estradiol induced carcinogenesis”. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 86 (3–5): 477–86. doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00377-7. 14623547.
- Giovannucci E, Martínez ME (December 1996). “Tobacco, colorectal cancer, and adenomas: a review of the evidence”. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 88(23): 1717–30. doi:10.1093/jnci/88.23.1717. 8944002.
- Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Payne CM, Dvorak K (July 2009). “Bile acids as endogenous etiologic agents in gastrointestinal cancer”. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 15 (27): 3329–40. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.3329. 2712893.
- Bernstein C, Holubec H, Bhattacharyya AK, Nguyen H, Payne CM, Zaitlin B, Bernstein H (August 2011). “Carcinogenicity of deoxycholate, a secondary bile acid”. Archives of Toxicology. 85 (8): 863–71. doi:10.1007/s00204-011-0648-7.
- Ding SZ, Minohara Y, Fan XJ, Wang J, Reyes VE, Patel J, Dirden-Kramer B, Boldogh I, Ernst PB, Crowe SE (August 2007). “Helicobacter pylori infection induces oxidative stress and programmed cell death in human gastric epithelial cells”. Infection and Immunity. 75 (8): 4030–9. doi:10.1128/IAI.00172-07.
- Handa O, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T (2011). “Redox biology and gastric carcinogenesis: the role of Helicobacter pylori”. Redox Report. 16 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1179/174329211X12968219310756.21605492.
- “Stomach cancer risks and causes”. Cancer Research UK.