Genetic testing, also known as DNA testing, allows the determination of bloodlines and the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases. In agriculture, a form of genetic testing known as progeny testing can be used to evaluate the quality of breeding stock. In population ecology, genetic testing can be used to track genetic strengths and vulnerabilities of species populations. Companies like 23andMe, MyHeritage or AncestryDNA, hoping to learn more about their family history, hereditary traits or other burning issues of existence.
In humans, genetic testing can be used to determine a child’s parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person’s ancestry or biological relationship between people. In addition to studying chromosomes to the level of individual genes, genetic testing in a broader sense includes biochemical tests for the possible presence of genetic diseases, or mutant forms of genes associated with increased risk of developing genetic disorders.
Genetic testing identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins. The variety of genetic tests has expanded throughout the years. In the past, the main genetic tests searched for abnormal chromosome numbers and mutations that lead to rare, inherited disorders. Today, tests involve analyzing multiple genes to determine the risk of developing specific diseases or disorders, with the more common diseases consisting of heart disease and cancer. The results of a genetic test can confirm or rule out a suspected genetic condition or help determine a person’s chance of developing or passing on a genetic disorder. Several hundred genetic tests are currently in use, and more are being developed.
Because genetic mutations can directly affect the structure of the proteins they code for, testing for specific genetic diseases can also be accomplished by looking at those proteins or their metabolites, or looking at stained or fluorescent chromosomes under a microscope.
- 1 Generalities
- 2 Non-diagnostic testing includes
- 3 List of genetic disorders
- 4 Risks
- 5 Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing
- 6 Conventional Medical Community Against DTC
- 7 Guidelines
- 8 Costs
- 9 Companies
- 10 Discussion
- 11 Legal Aspects
- 12 Conclusion
- 13 Biological Age Biomarker
- 14 Most Popular Genetic Testing Companies
- 15 Text under construction
Genetic testing is “the analysis of chromosomes (DNA), proteins, and certain metabolites in order to detect heritable disease-related genotypes, mutations, phenotypes, or karyotypes for clinical purposes.” It can provide information about a person’s genes and chromosomes throughout life. Available types of testing include:
Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing is a non-invasive (for the fetus) test. It is performed on a sample of venous blood from the mother, and can provide information about the fetus early in pregnancy. As of 2015 it is the most sensitive and specific screening test for Down syndrome.
Newborn screening: Newborn screening is used just after birth to identify genetic disorders that can be treated early in life. A blood sample is collected with a heel prick from the newborn 24–48 hours after birth and sent to the lab for analysis. In the United States, newborn screening procedure varies state by state, but all states by law test for at least 21 disorders. If abnormal results are obtained, it does not necessarily mean the child has the disorder. Diagnostic tests must follow the initial screening to confirm the disease. The routine testing of infants for certain disorders is the most widespread use of genetic testing—millions of babies are tested each year in the United States. All states currently test infants for phenylketonuria (a genetic disorder that causes mental illness if left untreated) and congenitalhypothyroidism (a disorder of the thyroid gland). People with PKU do not have an enzyme needed to process the amino acid phenylalanine, which is responsible for normal growth in children and normal protein use throughout their lifetime. If there is a buildup of too much phenylalanine, brain tissue can be damaged, causing developmental delay. Newborn screening can detect the presence of PKU, allowing children to be placed on special diets to avoid the effects of the disorder.
Diagnostic testing: Diagnostic testing is used to diagnose or rule out a specific genetic or chromosomal condition. In many cases, genetic testing is used to confirm a diagnosis when a particular condition is suspected based on physical mutations and symptoms. Diagnostic testing can be performed at any time during a person’s life, but is not available for all genes or all genetic conditions. The results of a diagnostic test can influence a person’s choices about health care and the management of the disease. For example, people with a family history of polycystic kidney disease (PKD) who experience pain or tenderness in their abdomen, blood in their urine, frequent urination, pain in the sides, a urinary tract infection or kidney stones may decide to have their genes tested and the result could confirm the diagnosis of PKD.
Carrier testing: Carrier testing is used to identify people who carry one copy of a gene mutation that, when present in two copies, causes a genetic disorder. This type of testing is offered to individuals who have a family history of a genetic disorder and to people in ethnic groups with an increased risk of specific genetic conditions. If both parents are tested, the test can provide information about a couple’s risk of having a child with a genetic condition like cystic fibrosis.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Genetic testing procedures that are performed on human embryos prior to the implantation as part of an in vitro fertilizationprocedure. Pre-implantation testing is used when individuals try to conceive a child through in vitro fertilization. Eggs from the woman and sperm from the man are removed and fertilized outside the body to create multiple embryos. The embryos are individually screened for abnormalities, and the ones without abnormalities are implanted in the uterus.
Prenatal diagnosis: Used to detect changes in a fetus’s genes or chromosomes before birth. This type of testing is offered to couples with an increased risk of having a baby with a genetic or chromosomal disorder. In some cases, prenatal testing can lessen a couple’s uncertainty or help them decide whether to abort the pregnancy. It cannot identify all possible inherited disorders and birth defects, however. One method of performing a prenatal genetic test involves an amniocentesis, which removes a sample of fluid from the mother’s amniotic sac 15 to 20 or more weeks into pregnancy. The fluid is then tested for chromosomal abnormalities such as Down syndrome (Trisomy 21) and Trisomy 18, which can result in neonatal or fetal death. Test results can be retrieved within 7–14 days after the test is done. This method is 99.4% accurate at detecting and diagnosing fetal chromosome abnormalities. Although there is a risk of miscarriage associated with an amniocentesis, the miscarriage rate is only 1/400. Another method of prenatal testing is Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS). Chorionic villi are projections from the placenta that carry the same genetic makeup as the baby. During this method of prenatal testing, a sample of chorionic villi is removed from the placenta to be tested. This test is performed 10–13 weeks into pregnancy and results are ready 7–14 days after the test was done. Another test using blood taken from the fetal umbilical cord is percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling.
Predictive and presymptomatic testing: Predictive and presymptomatic types of testing are used to detect gene mutations associated with disorders that appear after birth, often later in life. These tests can be helpful to people who have a family member with a genetic disorder, but who have no features of the disorder themselves at the time of testing. Predictive testing can identify mutations that increase a person’s chances of developing disorders with a genetic basis, such as certain types of cancer. For example, an individual with a mutation in BRCA1 has a 65% cumulative risk of breast cancer. Hereditary breast cancer along with ovarian cancer syndrome are caused by gene alterations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Major cancer types related to mutations in these genes are female breast cancer, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and male breast cancer. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is caused by a gene alteration on the gene TP53. Cancer types associated with a mutation on this gene include breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma (bone cancer), leukemia and brain tumors. In the Cowden syndrome there is a mutation on the PTEN gene, causing potential breast, thyroid or endometrial cancer. Presymptomatic testing can determine whether a person will develop a genetic disorder, such as hemochromatosis (an iron overload disorder), before any signs or symptoms appear. The results of predictive and presymptomatic testing can provide information about a person’s risk of developing a specific disorder, help with making decisions about medical care and provide a better prognosis.
Pharmacogenomics: type of genetic testing that determines the influence of genetic variation on drug response. When a person has a disease or health condition, pharmacogenomics can examine an individual’s genetic makeup to determine what medicine and what dosage would be the safest and most beneficial to the patient. In the human population, there are approximately 11 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in people’s genomes, making them the most common variations in the human genome. SNPs reveal information about an individual’s response to certain drugs. This type of genetic testing can be used for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. A sample of the cancer tissue can be sent in for genetic analysis by a specialized lab. After analysis, information retrieved can identify mutations in the tumor which can be used to determine the best treatment option.
Non-diagnostic testing includes
Forensic testing: Forensic testing uses DNA sequences to identify an individual for legal purposes. Unlike the tests described above, forensic testing is not used to detect gene mutations associated with disease. This type of testing can identify crime or catastrophe victims, rule out or implicate a crime suspect, or establish biological relationships between people (for example, paternity).
Paternity testing: This type of genetic test uses special DNA markers to identify the same or similar inheritance patterns between related individuals. Based on the fact that we all inherit half of our DNA from the father, and half from the mother, DNA scientists test individuals to find the match of DNA sequences at some highly differential markers to draw the conclusion of relatedness.
Genealogical DNA test: To determine ancestry or ethnic heritage for genetic genealogy
Research testing: Research testing includes finding unknown genes, learning how genes work and advancing our understanding of genetic conditions. The results of testing done as part of a research study are usually not available to patients or their healthcare providers.
List of genetic disorders
Many diseases have a genetic component with tests already available. This list is continuously changing with additions of new test availabilities. This list below is just a few of the thousands of tests available.
- African iron overload
Over-absorption of iron; accumulation of iron in vital organs (heart, liver, pancreas); organ damage; heart disease; cancer; liver disease; arthritis; diabetes; infertility; impotence
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
Obstructive lung disease in adults; liver cirrhosis during childhood; when a newborn or infant has jaundice that lasts for an extended period of time (more than a week or two), an enlarged spleen, ascites (fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity), pruritus (itching), and other signs of liver injury; persons under 40 years of age that develops wheezing, a chronic cough or bronchitis, is short of breath after exertion and/or shows other signs of emphysema (especially when the patient is not a smoker, has not been exposed to known lung irritants, and when the lung damage appears to be located low in the lungs); when you have a close relative with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency; when a patient has a decreased level of A1AT.
- Apolipoprotein E-associated
Elevation of both serum cholesterol and triglycerides; accelerated atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease; cutaneous xanthomas; peripheral vascular disease; diabetes mellitus, obesity or hypothyroidism. The APOE gene is also related to the development of complex genetic disorders like Alzheimer’s disease.
- Becker/Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Muscle weakness (rapidly progressive); frequent falls; difficulty with motor skills (running, hopping, jumping); progressive difficulty walking (ability to walk may be lost by age 12); fatigue; intellectual retardation (possible); skeletal deformities; chest and back (scoliosis); muscle deformities (contractures of heels, legs; pseudohypertrophy of calf muscles)
Reduced synthesis of the hemoglobin-beta chain; microcytic hypochromic anemia
- Factor II
Venous thrombosis; certain arterial thrombotic conditions; patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral vein thrombosis, and premature ischemic stroke and also of women with premature myocardial infarction; family history of early onset stroke, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolism, pregnancy associated with thrombosis/embolism, hyperhomocysteinemia, and multiple miscarriage. Individuals with the mutation are at increased risk of thrombosis in the setting of oral contraceptive use, trauma, and surgery.
- Factor V Leiden
Venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; transient ischemic attack or premature stroke; peripheral vascular disease, particularly lower extremity; occlusive disease; cerebral vein thrombosis; multiple spontaneous abortions; intrauterine fetal demise
Venous thrombosis; increased plasma homocysteine levels
- PAI-1 gene mutation
Independent risk factor for coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, venous thrombosis (including osteonecrosis)
- Breast, ovarian and prostate cancer
Uncontrolled division of cancer cells
- Crohn’s disease
Inflammation confined to the colon; abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea; anal fistulae and peri-rectal abscesses can also occur
- Cystic fibrosis
Large amount of abnormally thick mucus in the lungs and intestines; leads to congestioni, pneumonia, diarrhea and poor growth
- Deafness (non-syndromic)
Congenital loss of hearing; -prelingual, non-syndromic deafness
- Familial hypercholesterolemia
Tendon xanthomas; elevated LDL cholesterol; premature heart disease
- Fanconi anaemia
Predisposition of acute myeloid leukemia; skeletal abnormalities; radial hypoplasia and vertebral defect and other physical abnormalities, bone marrow failure (pancytopenia), endocrine dysfunction, early onset osteopenia/osteoporosis and lipid abnormalities, spontaneous chromosomal breakage exacerbated by exposure to DNA cross-linking agents.
- Fragile-X syndrome
Mental retardation or learning disabilities of unknown etiology; autism or autistic-like characteristics; women with premature menopause. Subtle dysmorphism, log face with prominent mandible and large ears, macroorchidism in postpubertal males, behavioral abnormalities, due to lack of FMR1 in areas such as the cerebral cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and cerebellum
- Friedreich’s ataxia
Characterized by slowly progressive ataxia; typically associated with depressed tendon reflexes, dysarthria, Babinski responses, and loss of position and vibration senses
- Hereditary hemochromatosis
Over-absorption of iron; accumulation of iron in vital organs (heart, liver, pancreas); organ damage; heart disease; cancer; liver disease; arthritis; diabetes; infertility; impotence
- Hirschsprung’s disease
Absence of ganglia in the gut
- Huntington disease
Progressive disorder of motor, cognitive, and psychiatric disturbances.
- Lactose Intolerance
Hypolactasia; persistent diarrhea; abdominal cramps; bloating; nausea; flatus
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia
MEN2A (which affects 60% to 90% of MEN2 families):Medullary thyroid carcinoma; Pheochromocytoma (tumor of the adrenal glands); Parathyroid adenomas (benign [noncancerous] tumors) or hyperplasia (increased size) of the parathyroid gland; MEN2B (which affects 5% of MEN2 families): Medullary thyroid carcinoma; Pheochromocytoma; Mucosal neuromas (benign tumors of nerve tissue on the tongue and lips); Digestive problems; Muscle, joint, and spinal problems; Typical facial features; Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC) (which affects 5% to 35% of MEN2 families):Medullary thyroid carcinoma only
- Myotonic muscular dystrophy
Affects skeletal and smooth muscle as well as the eye, heart, endocrine system, and central nervous system; clinical findings, which span a continuum from mild to severe, have been categorized into three somewhat overlapping phenotypes: mild, classic, and congenital.
- Pseudocholinesterase deficiency
Pseudocholinesterase (also called butyrylcholinesterase or “BCHE”) hydrolyzes a number of choline-based compounds including cocaine, heroin, procaine, and succinylcholine, mivacurium, and other fast-acting muscle relaxants. Mutations in the BCHE gene lead to deficiency in the amount or function of the protein, which in turn results in a delay in the metabolism of these compounds, which prolongs their effects. Succinylcholine is commonly used as an anaesthetic in surgical procedures, and a person with BCHE mutations may suffer prolonged paraylasis. Between 1 in 3200 and 1 in 5000 people carry BCHE mutations; they are most prevalent in Persian Jews and Alaska Natives. As of 2013 there are 9 genetic tests available.
- Sickle cell anaemia
Variable degrees of hemolysis and intermittent episodes of vascular occlusion resulting in tissue ischemia and acute and chronic organ dysfunction; complications include anemia, jaundice, predisposition to aplastic crisis, sepsis, cholelithiasis, and delayed growth. Diagnosis suspected in infants or young children with painful swelling of the hands and feet, pallor, jaundice, pneumococcal sepsis or meningitis, severe anemia with splenic enlargement, or acute chest syndrome.
- Tay–Sachs disease
Lipids accumulate in the brain; neurological dysfunction; progressive weakness and loss of motor skills; decreased social interaction, seizures, blindness, and total debilitation
- Variegate porphyria
Cutaneous photosensitivity; acute neurovisceral crises
Genetic testing is often done as part of a genetic consultation and as of mid-2008 there were more than 1,200 clinically applicable genetic tests available. Once a person decides to proceed with genetic testing, a medical geneticist, genetic counselor, primary care doctor, or specialist can order the test after obtaining informed consent.
Genetic tests are performed on a sample of blood, hair, skin, amniotic fluid (the fluid that surrounds a fetus during pregnancy), or other tissue. For example, a medical procedure called a buccal smear uses a small brush or cotton swab to collect a sample of cells from the inside surface of the cheek. Alternatively, a small amount of saline mouthwash may be swished in the mouth to collect the cells. The sample is sent to a laboratory where technicians look for specific changes in chromosomes, DNA, or proteins, depending on the suspected disorders, often using DNA sequencing. The laboratory reports the test results in writing to a person’s doctor or genetic counselor.
Routine newborn screening tests are done on a small blood sample obtained by pricking the baby’s heel with a lancet.
The physical risks associated with most genetic tests are very small, particularly for those tests that require only a blood sample or buccal smear (a procedure that samples cells from the inside surface of the cheek). The procedures used for prenatal testing carry a small but non-negligible risk of losing the pregnancy (miscarriage) because they require a sample of amniotic fluid or tissue from around the fetus.
Many of the risks associated with genetic testing involve the emotional, social, or financial consequences of the test results. People may feel angry, depressed, anxious, or guilty about their results. The potential negative impact of genetic testing has led to an increasing recognition of a “right not to know”. In some cases, genetic testing creates tension within a family because the results can reveal information about other family members in addition to the person who is tested. The possibility of genetic discrimination in employment or insurance is also a concern. Some individuals avoid genetic testing out of fear it will affect their ability to purchase insurance or find a job. Health insurers do not currently require applicants for coverage to undergo genetic testing, and when insurers encounter genetic information, it is subject to the same confidentiality protections as any other sensitive health information. In the United States, the use of genetic information is governed by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) (see discussion below in the section on government regulation).
Genetic testing can provide only limited information about an inherited condition. The test often can’t determine if a person will show symptoms of a disorder, how severe the symptoms will be, or whether the disorder will progress over time. Another major limitation is the lack of treatment strategies for many genetic disorders once they are diagnosed.
Another limitation to genetic testing for a hereditary linked cancer, is the variants of unknown clinical significance. Because the human genome has over 22,000 genes, there are 3.5 million variants in the average person’s genome. These variants of unknown clinical significance means there is a change in the DNA sequence, however the increase for cancer is unclear because it is unknown if the change affects the gene’s function.
A genetics professional can explain in detail the benefits, risks, and limitations of a particular test. It is important that any person who is considering genetic testing understand and weigh these factors before making a decision.
Other risks include accidental findings—a discovery of some possible problem found while looking for something else. In 2013 the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) that certain genes always be included any time a genomic sequencing was done, and that labs should report the results.
Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing is a type of genetic test that is accessible directly to the consumer without having to go through a health care professional. Usually, to obtain a genetic test, health care professionals (such as doctors) acquire their patient’s permission and then order the desired test. DTC genetic tests, however, allow consumers to bypass this process and order DNA tests themselves.
There is a variety of DTC tests, ranging from tests for breast cancer alleles to mutations linked to cystic fibrosis. Benefits of DTC testing are the accessibility of tests to consumers, promotion of proactive healthcare, and the privacy of genetic information. Possible additional risks of DTC testing are the lack of governmental regulation, the potential misinterpretation of genetic information, issues related to testing minors, privacy of data, and downstream expenses for the public health care system.
Conventional Medical Community Against DTC
DTC genetic testing has been controversial due to outspoken opposition within the medical community. Critics of DTC testing argue against the risks involved, the unregulated advertising and marketing claims, and the overall lack of governmental oversight.
DTC testing involves many of the same risks associated with any genetic test. One of the more obvious and dangerous of these is the possibility of misreading of test results. Without professional guidance, consumers can potentially misinterpret genetic information, causing them to be deluded about their personal health.
Some advertising for DTC genetic testing has been criticized as conveying an exaggerated and inaccurate message about the connection between genetic information and disease risk, utilizing emotions as a selling factor. An advertisement for a BRCA-predictive genetic test for breast cancer stated: “There is no stronger antidote for fear than information.”
Ancestry.com, a company providing DTC DNA tests for genealogy purposes, has reportedly allowed the warrantless search of their database by police investigating a murder. The warrantless search led to a search warrant to force the gathering of a DNA sample from a New Orleans filmmaker; however he turned out not to be a match for the suspected killer.
Currently, the U.S. has no strong federal regulation moderating the DTC market. Though there are several hundred tests available, only a handful are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); these are sold as at-home test kits, and are therefore considered “medical devices” over which the FDA may assert jurisdiction. Other types of DTC tests require customers to mail in DNA samples for testing; it is difficult for the FDA to exercise jurisdiction over these types of tests, because the actual testing is completed in the laboratories of providers. As of 2007, the FDA had not yet officially substantiated with scientific evidence the claimed accuracy of the majority of direct-to-consumer genetic tests.
With regard to genetic testing and information in general, legislation in the United States called the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act prohibits group health plans and health insurers from denying coverage to a healthy individual or charging that person higher premiums based solely on a genetic predisposition to developing a disease in the future. The legislation also bars employers from using individuals’ genetic information when making hiring, firing, job placement, or promotion decisions.The legislation, the first of its kind in the U.S., was passed by the United States Senate on April 24, 2008, on a vote of 95-0, and was signed into law by President George W. Bush on May 21, 2008. It went into effect on November 21, 2009.
In June 2013 the US Supreme Court issued two rulings on human genetics. The Court struck down patents on human genes, opening up competition in the field of genetic testing. The Supreme Court also ruled that police were allowed to collect DNA from people arrested for serious offenses.
Some possible future ethical problems of genetic testing were considered in the science fiction film Gattaca, the novel Next, and the science fiction anime series “Gundam Seed”. Also, some films which include the topic of genetic testing include The Island, Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers, and the Resident Evil series.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) have provided new guidelines for the ethical issue of pediatrics genetic testing and screening of children in the United States. Their guidelines state that performing pediatric genetic testing should be in the best interest of the child. In hypothetical situations for adults getting genetically tested 84-98% expressing interest in getting genetically tested for cancer predisposition. Though only half who are at risk of would get tested. AAP and ACMG recommend holding off on genetic testing for late-onset conditions until adulthood. Unless diagnosing genetic disorders during childhood and start early intervention can reduce morbidity or mortality. They also state that with parents or guardians permission testing for asymptomatic children who are at risk of childhood onset conditions are ideal reasons for pediatrics genetic testing. Testing for pharmacogenetics and newborn screeningis found to be acceptable by AAP and ACMG guidelines. Histocompatibility testing guideline states that it’s permissible for children of all ages to have tissue compatibility testing for immediate family members but only after the psychosocial, emotional and physical implications has been explored. With a donor advocate or similar mechanism should be in place to protect the minors from coercion and to safeguard the interest of said minor. Both AAP and ACMG discourage the use of direct-to-consumer and home kit genetic because of the accuracy, interpretation and oversight of test content. Guidelines also state that if parents or guardians should be encouraged to inform their child of the results from the genetic test if the minor is of appropriate age. If minor is of mature appropriate age and request results, the request should be honored. Though for ethical and legal reasons health care providers should be cautions in providing minors with predictive genetic testing without the involvement of parents or guardians. Within the guidelines AAP and ACMG state that health care provider have an obligation to inform parents or guardians on the implication of test results. To encourage patients and families to share information and even offer help in explain results to extend family or refer them to genetic counseling. AAP and ACMG state any type of predictive genetic testing for all types is best offer with genetic counseling being offer by Clinical genetics, genetic counselors or health care providers.
Israel uses DNA testing to determine if people are eligible for immigration. The policy where “many Jews from the Former Soviet Union (‘FSU’) are asked to provide DNA confirmation of their Jewish heritage in the form of paternity tests in order to immigrate as Jews and become citizens under Israel’s Law of Return” has generated controversy.
The cost of genetic testing can range from under $100 to more than $2,000. This depends on the complexity of the test. The cost will increase if more than one test is necessary or if multiple family members are getting tested to obtain additional results. Costs can vary by state and some states cover part of the total cost.
From the date that a sample is taken, results may take weeks to months, depending upon the complexity and extent of the tests being performed. Results for prenatal testing are usually available more quickly because time is an important consideration in making decisions about a pregnancy. Prior to the testing, the doctor or genetic counselor who is requesting a particular test can provide specific information about the cost and time frame associated with that test.
Some of those companies are located in the Bay Area. San Francisco–based Vitagene offers to analyze how ancestry affects personal nutrition and health, claiming that its methodology “leverages big data, machine learning, and the latest scientific research and technology” to devise a client-specific diet and fitness plan. Another company, GenoPalate, employs geneticists and registered dietitians to examine genetic profiles and give targeted nutritional advice. Most of these tests study DNA extracted from saliva; others, like San Francisco’s uBiome, get a bit more intimate, studying mailed-in vaginal swabs and fecal samples to produce information about a customer’s microbiome (the full genetic complement of bacteria and other microorganisms in a body) and assess gut or vaginal health.
In a 2018 Women’s Health magazine interview, Dr. Leo Treyzon, a gastroenterologist at L.A.’s Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, says that while uBiome and other purveyors of at-home testing kits can help people take their health into their own hands, the data provided isn’t very insightful yet. “In 2018 we can look at your gut and give you data on it, but the research on what you can actually do with those results isn’t actually there,” he maintains.
Even so, DNA products keep appearing on the market. In October 2018, Mountain View–based 23andMe gained an advantage over its competition when the FDA approved a test it uses that examines how the body processes medications, including drugs addressing depression. (Before then, the company was already offering screenings for some of the genes involved in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and breast cancer, in addition to ancestry-tracing services.) The day after that green light, the FDA seemed to backpedal, stressing that patients and their doctors should not make treatment decisions based on such testing in lieu of medical lab work and exams
According to a February 2018 article in MIT Technology Review, more than 12 million Americans have taken a direct-to-consumer DNA test, a number that by now has undoubtedly multiplied since the recent winter holidays. AncestryDNA claims to have “shattered” its November records thanks to Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales and says its kits were Amazon’s bestselling non-Amazon-branded product on Cyber Monday for the second year in a row.
Yet as the quantity of shared genetic information has grown, so have concerns about what’s done with it. Crowdsourced online databases like GEDmatch, DNA.Land and Open Humans, where users can anonymously upload DNA test results, present privacy issues. Also, test results, for all the interesting insights they yield, can also present data that aren’t always clear, and as with most new scientific and technological strides, it can take time for laws to catch up. Control of that info is another issue: In July 2018 the internet exploded when British pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline gained an exclusive right to mine 23andMe’s customer data for drug development purposes. The arrangement was legal, though: after you drop that tube in the mail the testing companies own it, and while there are some restrictions, the range of permitted uses is murky. Most famously, police used GEDmatch to capture the Golden State Killer and the NorCal Rapist, but data from genetic material has many other possible applications.
And while test results can clue you in to your familial or ethnic lineage, they can’t confirm that you’re 100 percent Italian. “Autosomal [numbered DNA] ethnicity estimates really tell us ethnicity from about 500 years ago,” says Colleen Greene, a genealogist who teaches a graduate genealogy course in the School of Information at San Jose State University. “People often do not understand that and get confused, because they know their ancestors lived in, say, Ireland, 150 years ago.” Ethnicity testing can be pretty accurate geographically — good at indicating if your ancestors came from Southern Europe or West Africa — but if you’re trying to boil it down to a percentage, the results are more iffy. Since each company gets a different sample of your genome, findings can vary significantly from one kit to another; “in addition to these differing snapshots, testing companies also use different algorithms to analyze those snapshots, different reference populations to compare data, and different categories for grouping ethnicities,” adds Greene.
Gattaca was released in 1997, but it took the federal government more than a decade to catch up with its topic. In 2008 Congress passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, known as GINA. It bans use of genetic information in health insurance applications, preventing insurers from denying coverage or charging higher premiums based on someone’s genetic predisposition for someday developing a disease. The law also prohibits employers from using genetic information in making hiring, firing or other personnel decisions.
Still, a bill introduced in Congress could undermine those protections. House Resolution 1313 would let employers offer substantial health insurance discounts to employees who participate in a company-run wellness program that may include genetic screening; the law would let employers charge higher premiums to employees who opt out. In December 2017 the bill was brought to the House floor without committee review but hasn’t progressed since.
Meanwhile, the future of genetics is looking more sci-fi than ever. This past November, Chinese scientist He Jiankui prompted a global outcry when he announced he’d successfully altered two babies’ genetic code by using a gene-editing technology called CRISPR. His claim has been met with skepticism, and the scientific community unequivocally condemned Jiankui; the Chinese government suspended his research, and in December he was reportedly being sequestered under guard.
But legitimate gene-editing research is happening in our own backyard. “There are a number of labs here that are using the CRISPR technology,” says Kris Rebillot, director of communications at the Buck Institute for Research on Aging in Novato. “The Ellerby Lab is one key lab that’s working on Huntington’s disease and they’re trying to do gene replacement therapy.” CRISPR, genomics, and deriving stem cells from patients are just some of the technologies our researchers are using to learn more about the mechanisms of Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and similar age-related neurodegenerative disease.
“There is the idea is that we all have two different ages,” says Eric Verdin, president and CEO at the Buck. “One, the chronological age, is how many years you have lived, and two, the biological age, is based on molecular and cellular health,” or more specifically, “Are you like the average population, or have you aged faster or slower?” Blood samples can help provide answers, though the research is still experimental. “We don’t really fully know what to do with these numbers,” Verdin says, “and it’s part of a whole change in the field of aging where we are trying to measure precisely how do people age.”
Biological Age Biomarker
There are spit-in-a-vial kits for that too, from companies like myDNAge or TeloYears. But researchers at the Buck hope their own work can point the way to a proactive, preventive-medicine approach to diseases brought on by aging — interventions that would prevent people from getting sick in the first place — and ways to track the effectiveness of treatments.
Most Popular Genetic Testing Companies
TOP GENETIC TESTING COMPANIES
What it’s ideal for Looking for long-lost relatives
Key feature Offers both ancestry and health results
What it’s ideal for Looking for recent ancestors
Key feature Largest and most diverse database, low cost
What it’s ideal for Cat breed and their risk for health conditions
Key feature Ancestry, personality traits, and diet recommendations
What it’s ideal for Specific tests for detailed insights
Key feature Offers over 35 DNA-powered kits and products
What it’s ideal for Exact breakdown of ethnic makeup
Key feature Covers 80 different regions worldwide
What it’s ideal for Estimating your biological age
Key feature Measuring the epigenetic modifications on your DNA instead of genetic marks
What it’s ideal for Learning more about your gut and/or vaginal microbiome
Key feature Detecting microorganisms associated with specific infections
What it’s ideal for People looking for a specific road map for their bodies
Key feature Customized fitness, vitamin and diet plan
What it’s ideal for Dog breed and disease detection
Key feature World’s largest breed database, trait analysis and drug exercise testing
Text under construction
- “What is genetic testing? – Genetics Home Reference”. Ghr.nlm.nih.gov. 2011-05-30. Retrieved 2011-06-07.
- “Regulation of Genetic Tests”. National Human Genome Research Institute. USA.gov. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
- “Genetic Testing: MedlinePlus”. Nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2011-06-07.
- “Definitions of Genetic Testing”. Definitions of Genetic Testing (Jorge Sequeiros and Bárbara Guimarães). EuroGentest Network of Excellence Project. 2008-09-11. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved 2008-08-10.
- Human Genome Project Information. Gene Testing
- Holtzman NA, Murphy PD, Watson MS, Barr PA (October 1997). “Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice”. Science. 278 (5338): 602–5. doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.602. PMID 9381169.
- Van den Veyver, IB (28 October 2016). “Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing”. F1000Research. 5: 2591. doi:10.12688/f1000research.9215.1. PMC 5089140. PMID 27853526.
- Permezel, Michael; Walker, Susan; Kyprianou, Kypros (2015). Beischer & MacKay’s Obstetrics, Gynaecology and the Newborn. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 74. ISBN 9780729584050. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
- Genetics Home Reference. “Newborn Screening”. Genetics Home Reference. Retrieved 2015-03-22.
- Mayo Clinic Staff. “Polycystic Kidney Disease”. Mayo Clinic. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- Mayo Clinic Staff. “Genetic testing Why it’s done – Tests and Procedures – Mayo Clinic”. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 2015-01-22.
- John A. Haugen Associates Obstetrics and Gynecology. “The Facts on Prenatal Testing”. John A. Haugen Associates Obstetrics and Gynecology. Archived from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2015-03-26.
- Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer as…
- “Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes”. National Cancer Institute. National Institute of Health. 2013-04-22. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- “Genetic Testing”. American Medical Association. Retrieved 2015-01-23.
- “Genomic Tumor Assessment”. Cancer Treatment Centers for America. Rising Tide. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- Reference, Genetics Home. “African iron overload”. Genetics Home Reference. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
- Galanello, Renzo; Origa, Raffaella (2010-05-21). “Beta-thalassemia”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 5: 11. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-5-11. ISSN 1750-1172. PMC 2893117. PMID 20492708.
- Reference, Genetics Home. “Hereditary hemochromatosis”. Genetics Home Reference. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
- National Library of Medicine, Genetics Home Reference. Pseudocholinesterase deficiency
- Soliday, F. K.; Conley, Y. P.; Henker, R. (2010). “Pseudocholinesterase deficiency: A comprehensive review of genetic, acquired, and drug influences”. AANA Journal. 78 (4): 313–320. PMID 20879632.
- National Library of Medicine, Genetic Testing Registry. Deficiency of butyrylcholine esterase
- Allingham-Hawkins, Diane (2008-08-01). “Successful Genetic Tests Are Predicated on Clinical Utility”. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. 28(14). Mary Ann Liebert. pp. 6, 9. ISSN 1935-472X. Retrieved 2008-09-23.
- “Genetics Home Reference: What are the risks and limitations of genetic testing?”. NIH. November 15, 2016.
- R, Andorno (2004). “The right not to know: an autonomy based approach”. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30 (5): 435–439. doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001578. ISSN 0306-6800. PMC 1733927. PMID 15467071.
- Wendelsdorf, Katherine (1 October 2013). “You have a genetic disorder: Should your family be told they might carry the mutation?”. Genetic Literacy Project.
- Amy Harmon, “Insurance Fears Lead Many to Shun DNA Tests,” The New York Times, February 24, 2008
- “Genetic Information and Medical Expense Insurance”, American Academy of Actuaries, June 2000
- King, Elisabeth (2017). “Genetic Testing: Challenges and changes in testing for hereditary cancer syndromes”. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 21 (5): 589–598. doi:10.1188/17.cjon.589-598. PMID 28945723.
- Wendelsdorf, Katherine (17 September 2013). “Personal gene maps: Is there such a thing as too much information about our DNA?”. Genetic Literacy Project.
- Powledge, Tabitha M. (24 March 2015). “What should be done with unsettling ‘incidental findings’ in gene screens?”. Genetic Literacy Project.
- Borry, Pascal; Cornel, Martina C.; Howard, Heidi C. (2010). “Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market”. Journal of Community Genetics. 1 (3): 101–106. doi:10.1007/s12687-010-0023-z. ISSN 1868-310X. PMC 3063844. PMID 21475669.
- Audeh MW (2008). “Letting the genome out of the bottle”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 358 (20): 2184–5, author reply 2185. doi:10.1056/nejmc086053. PMID 18494080.
- Hunter DJ, Khoury MJ, Drazen JM (2008). “Letting the genome out of the bottle—will we get our wish?”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 358 (2): 105–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0708162. PMID 18184955.
- Gollust et al., “Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Clinical Genetic Testing,” JAMA.2002; 288: 1762-1767
- Ronald Bailey, ” Ancestry.com Hands Over Client DNA Test Results to Cops Without a Warrant” Reason.com
- Jim Mustian. “New Orleans filmmaker cleared in cold-case murder; false positive highlights limitations of familial DNA searching”. The New Orleans Advocate.
- Shawna Williams and Gail Javitt, “Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: empowering or endangering the public?,” The Genetics and Public Policy Center, July 25, 2006 (updated 6/15/2007)
- Statement of Administration policy, Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, 27 April 2007
- Kennedy in support of genetic information nondiscrimination bill, Abril 24, 2008. Last access: 28/05/2008.
- Keim, Brandon (May 21, 2008). “Genetic Discrimination by Insurers, Employers Becomes a Crime”. Wired.com. Retrieved 2008-05-28.
- “Administration News | President Bush Signs Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation Into Law,” Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, Kaiser Family Foundation, May 22, 2008
- Liptak, Adam (June 13, 2013), “Justices, 9-0, Bar Patenting Human Genes”, New York Times, retrieved June 30, 2013
- Liptak, Adam (June 3, 2013), “Justices Allow DNA Collection After an Arrest”, New York Times, retrieved June 30, 2013
- Rochman, Bonnie (February 21, 2013). “New Guidelines for Genetic Testing in Children”. Time.
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Bioethics; AAP Committee on Genetics; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee (March 2013). “Policy Statement: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children” (PDF). Pediatrics. 131 (3): 620–2. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3680. PMID 23428972All policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time
- Ross, LF; Saal, HM; David, KL; Anderson, RR; American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (March 2013). “Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children”(PDF). Genetics in Medicine. 15 (3): 234–45. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.176. PMID 23429433.
- McGonigle, Ian V. (2015). “Genetic citizenship: DNA testing and the Israeli Law of Return”. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2 (2): 469–478. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsv027. PMC 5034383. PMID 27774208. Retrieved 21 May2016.
- Jerusalem Post:’Who is a Jew?’ can now be answered by genetic testing
- Jerusalem Post: Should Jewishness be determined by a genetic test?
- Is It Possible to Make Aliyah to Israel on the Basis of a DNA Test?
- “Genetics Home Reference: What is the cost of genetic testing, and how long does it take to get the results?”. NIH. November 15, 2016.